Ben Gregory Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 I'm new to this ....Does anyone know what this means please and how to change it?Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Mermoud Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 In the System part, you have defined modules which will require a given area. In the 3D shading part, the area foreseen for this sub-array has not sufficiently area for placing all the PV modules defined in the system. Therefore there is a contradiction in you system design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Gregory Posted April 24, 2014 Author Share Posted April 24, 2014 Thank you Andre.Another question: Is there a tool for working out the optimum spacing between rows of modules?ThanksBen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Mermoud Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 No, because there is no optimum: this is a multi-criteria and multi-variable problem.See for example the article Optimization of row-arrangement in PV Systems, shading loss evaluations according to module positioning and connexions (A. Mermoud, EPVSEC 2012), on our site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now