Jump to content

Meteonorm vs PVGIS horizons


laurahin

Recommended Posts

We have compared the effect of Meteonorm and PVGIS horizons and found that the far shading loss was typically greater for the PVGIS version.  In making the comparisons, we noticed that the profiles as shown in the PVsyst report "Sun Paths" diagram have different characters.  Even though the number of points used to define the profiles is similar, the PVGIS profile always appears smooth whereas the Meteonorm profile is blocky.  Is there any particular reason for that?

I would expect the Meteonorm and PVGIS horizons to be the same, since they use the same spatial resolution (90m) and likely both rely on data from the Space Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, although I haven't been able to confirm this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  1. Meteonorm and PVGIS both use SRTM (depending on the coordinates); Meteonorm with 3 x 3 degree tiles, PVGIS with 2.5 x 2.5.
  2. PVGIS calculates to the first decimal while Meteonorm rounds to whole numbers. 
  3. PVGIS uses 48 points (excluding 0 degree), 7.5 degree increments, whereas Meteonorm uses 1 degree increments. This causes the difference in smoothness. Repeated values are excluded in PVsyst. If you evaluate a complex site, you will find there is a significant difference in the number of horizon data points between the two. For example, one project site evaluated shows 29 points for PVGIS and 56 for Meteonorm.
  4. I would conclude that the differences lie with PVGIS and Meteonorm and the methods by which each is performing the calculations. PVsyst is importing the correct values one would retrieve directly from each source. 

PVGIS Topography.png

Meteonorm Topography.png

Edited by dtarin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only comment to PVsyst is that when PVGIS is used, the comment which displays the coordinates incorrectly shows the minutes ' and seconds " notations. The coordinates should read (degrees, minutes, seconds), but it is displays as such:  40°5"17', Long=-77°39"53', which shows degrees, seconds, minutes. Whether this is from PVGIS or PVsyst, I do not know. 

Edited by dtarin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply, @dtarin   I did believe that the issue was with the data sets, not PVsyst, but couldn't find documentation of the data sets beyond what you included.  Thus your statement in point three concerning the resolution of the horizons is quite useful. 

Laura

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...