smeredith Posted February 13, 2023 Posted February 13, 2023 I noticed something about bifacial simulations for trackers that I think is an error. If you calculate the sky diffuse view factor on the rear side, you'll notice that the view factor is different depending on whether the module has a positive or negative tilt (PhiAng). Below is a graph showing the view factor as a function of tilt for GCR = 0.5. As you can see, the view factor is always higher for negative tilts compared to positive tilts. This behavior seems to be consistent across all GCRs. I was wondering if this was intended behavior or if this is an error - to me, it doesn't make sense that the view factor would be different depending on if the tracker was facing east or west.
smeredith Posted February 22, 2023 Author Posted February 22, 2023 Does anyone from PVsyst have thoughts on this? Is this a bug or intended behavior?
Bruno Wittmer Posted February 27, 2023 Posted February 27, 2023 This is not intended behavior. Can you explain how exactly you created this plot? Is it a simulation result, or were the values obtained with the tools in the bifacial model window?
smeredith Posted March 1, 2023 Author Posted March 1, 2023 This was calculated from the 8760 CSV. Before running the simulation, I changed the circumsolar calculation to be included in the diffuse component in order to get a more accurate calculation of the rear sky diffuse factor, as I understand that it is by default removed from the diffuse component and added to the direct component. Then I calculated the rear sky diffuse factor as DifSBak/DiffHor, and plotted the view factors for both positive and negative PhiAng. The above graph is the result of that.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now