Jump to content

Problem with several orientations and azimuth - shading 3D view


JaviBrave

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone.

I'm learning how to use Pvsyst v6.70 and I have a trouble related to shadings field with 2 orientations.

I have tried many options to solve this but It makes no sense for me. Please need help.

I add the 3D shading views:

https://ibb.co/zWM72mq
https://ibb.co/6rd4sJ9

 

Also the compatibility system-shadings given by Pvsyst:

https://ibb.co/9b88mTj

 

 

It sames easy to see both orientations of the PV modules (azimut 0º and 45º). Both have 45º tilt.

How it is possible this happens? It's an easy correlation between azimut 0º and 45º. In the 3D images it makes totally clear. Where did the 10.8º come from?

 

I add the System Overview to make myself more clear:

 

Count=86

Orientation parameters
Field type:                              Several orientations
2 orientations: tilt/azim =       45°/0°,  45°/45°,  

Compatibility between System and Shadings
Orientación #1                       inclin/acim = 45° / 0°
      4 sub-arrays                     PNom = 25 kWp,  modules area = 137 m²
      shading 3D fields              1 Tablas,      : , total rough area , . 24 m²
      Orientation #1:  The Shading area is lower than the PV modules area. 
Orientación #2                       inclin/acim = 45° / 45°
      0 sub-arrays                     No sub-array defined
      shading 3D fields              No shading 3D fields defined
      Orientation #2:  No Shading field defined 

System parameters
4 sub-arrays defined
Sub-array #1                         Sub-generador #1
Orientation #1Tilt/Azimut = 45.0° / 0.0°
PV modules:                            2 strings of 11 modules in series, 22  total
    Pnom = 300 Wp                 Pnom array = 6.6 kWp,  Area = 36 m²
Inverters  (6.00 kWac)          2 MPPT inputs, Total 6 kWac,
Sub-array #2                         Sub-generador #2
Orientation #1Tilt/Azimut = 45.0° / 0.0°
PV modules:                            2 strings of 11 modules in series, 22  total
    Pnom = 300 Wp                 Pnom array = 6.6 kWp,  Area = 36 m²
Inverters  (6.00 kWac)          2 MPPT inputs, Total 6 kWac,
Sub-array #3                         Sub-generador #3
Orientation #1Tilt/Azimut = 45.0° / 0.0°
PV modules:                            1 strings of 7 modules in series, 7  total
    Pnom = 300 Wp                 Pnom array = 2.10 kWp,  Area = 12 m²
Inverters  (2.00 kWac)          1 units, Total 2 kWac,  PNom 
Sub-array #4                         Sub-generador #4
Orientation #1Tilt/Azimut = 45.0° / 0.0°
PV modules:                            2 strings of 16 modules in series, 32  total
    Pnom = 300 Wp                 Pnom array = 9.6 kWp,  Area = 53 m²
Inverters  (8.20 kWac)          2 MPPT inputs, Total 8 kWac,
You have defined an orientation #2 with Tilt = 45° and azimut = 45° but no PV 
array has been attributed to it.

Shading scene parameters
9 fields defined                       Total Area  140.9 m²
Field #1: polygonal                14 modulos izq
                                               Total area = 23.8 m²
Orientation #1                       Tilt/Azimut = 45.0° / 0.0°
Field #2: polygonal                5 modulos izq
                                               Total area = 8.5 m²
Orientation #-1                      Tilt/Azimut = 45.0° / 0.0°
   Not matching any definition in the "Orientation" part !
Field #3: polygonal                3 modulos izq
                                               Total area = 5.1 m²
Orientation #-1                      Tilt/Azimut = 45.0° / 0.0°
   Not matching any definition in the "Orientation" part !
Field #4: polygonal                14 modulos der
                                               Total area = 23.8 m²
Orientation #-1                      Tilt/Azimut = 45.0° / 0.0°
   Not matching any definition in the "Orientation" part !
Field #5: polygonal                5 modulos der
                                               Total area = 8.5 m²
Orientation #-1                      Tilt/Azimut = 45.0° / 0.0°
   Not matching any definition in the "Orientation" part !
Field #6: polygonal                3 modulos der
                                               Total area = 5.1 m²
Orientation #-1                      Tilt/Azimut = 45.0° / 0.0°
   Not matching any definition in the "Orientation" part !
Field #7: polygonal                Campo poligonal
                                               Total area = 11.9 m²
Orientation #-1                      Tilt/Azimut = 45.0° / 0.0°
   Not matching any definition in the "Orientation" part !
Field #8: polygonal                Campo poligonal
                                               Total area = 27.2 m²
Orientation #-1                      Tilt/Azimut = 45.0° / 45.0°
   Not matching any definition in the "Orientation" part !
Field #9: polygonal                Campo poligonal
                                               Total area = 27.2 m²
Orientation #-1                      Tilt/Azimut = 45.0° / 45.0°
   Not matching any definition in the "Orientation" part !
Orientation #-1                      8 tables, Area = 117.2 m²
Simulacion 221107
List of other shading objects  
Obstacle #-9                          Cuerpo del edificio
Obstacle #-9                          Tejado 2 fases + aguilones
Obstacle #-9                          Tejado 2 fases + aguilones
Obstacle #-9                          Mansarda
Obstacle #-9                          Prisma - chimenea
Use in simulation:                   Detailed electrical loss using Module 
Layout

 

 

 

Edited by JaviBrave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't understand. It has to be a bug.

I see what you tell me about the orientation #-1 in the system summary.

However, in each field between #2 and #7 it is 0º orientation which matchs with the orientation #1 defined in its menu. Also, for fields #8 and #9 it is written 45º orientation, just as orientation #2 in "Orientation" menu. Those orientations can be clearly seen in the shading views.

 

If I delete the fields #8 and #9 and also delete orientation #2 (45º). There is no problem with fields #2 to #7... The problem appears if I try to set different orientations.

 

Sorry if I have newbie doubts but I cannot keep trying without solving this.

 

Thank you.

 

Edited by JaviBrave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...