Grzegorz Buczma Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 Hello,did I correctly enter the module's data into the database? Energy production results seem too low. Module Q.CELLS Q.PEAK DUO L-G5.2 400Manufacturer data sheet:http://pliki.domrel.pl/PVSF/Q_CELLS_Data_sheet.pngMy PVsyst module data tabs:http://pliki.domrel.pl/PVSF/Tab1.pnghttp://pliki.domrel.pl/PVSF/Tab2.pngI have not changed other tabs.Exported to excel: http://pliki.domrel.pl/PVSF/qc.xlsShould I improve something??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtarin Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 It looks like you are missing the cell dimensions in the PAN file (122.2 cm^2 is my guess based on the 390W). Verify you have the correct power temperature coefficient Pmpp. Also your Rshunt G=0 & Rsh dont match the 390W PAN file. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grzegorz Buczma Posted July 1, 2019 Author Share Posted July 1, 2019 Thank you for your interest and answer.Currently, the module parameters are as follows:http://pliki.domrel.pl/PVSF/p1.pnghttp://pliki.domrel.pl/PVSF/p2.pnghttp://pliki.domrel.pl/PVSF/p3.pnghttp://pliki.domrel.pl/PVSF/p4.pnghttp://pliki.domrel.pl/PVSF/p5.pngPAN file: PVObject_=pvModule Version=6.81 Flags=$0743 PVObject_Commercial=pvCommercial Flags=$0041 Manufacturer=Hanwha Q Cells Model=Q.PEAK DUO L-G5.2 400 DataSource=Manufacturer 2019 YearBeg=2019 Width=1.000 Height=2.015 Depth=0.035 Weight=23.500 NPieces=100 PriceDate=27/06/19 11:19 End of PVObject pvCommercial Technol=mtSiMono NCelS=72 NCelP=2 NDiode=3 GRef=1000 TRef=25.0 PNom=400.0 PNomTolLow=0.00 PNomTolUp=1.40 Isc=10.240 Voc=49.00 Imp=9.750 Vmp=41.04 muISC=4.00 muVocSpec=-140.0 muPmpReq=-0.360 RShunt=400 Rp_0=1600 Rp_Exp=5.50 RSerie=0.212 Gamma=0.977 muGamma=-0.0005 VMaxIEC=1500 VMaxUL=1500 Absorb=0.90 ARev=3.200 BRev=12.288 RDiode=0.010 VRevDiode=-0.70 AirMassRef=1.500 CellArea=122.2 SandiaAMCorr=50.000 End of PVObject pvModule Is it OK now? Production has improved :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtarin Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 The Rsh and Rshunt exponential are different in my 390W PAN file, but that's not to say yours are incorrect. As long as you have your own 390W PAN file to go off of, it should be ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grzegorz Buczma Posted July 2, 2019 Author Share Posted July 2, 2019 Thank you. I will leave it as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now