Helios210 Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 There would appear to be a bug for "Produced Energy" in the report generation when reports are generated during batch simulations and use bi-facial modules, please see the attached screenshot for an example.Best,H.See "Produced Energy" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
André Mermoud Posted February 5, 2019 Share Posted February 5, 2019 Please explain what you think is a bug in the "Produced energy". This normalized way of presenting the simulation data is indeed not well-suited for Bi-facial systems.The additional energy (bifacial gain) is indeed added to the Ya value, i.e. deduced from the array losses La. If sufficient, it could indeed lead to negative La values, and even PR values greater than one. However I don't know any official definition of these normalized variables for describing the bi-facial systems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helios210 Posted May 21, 2019 Author Share Posted May 21, 2019 Hi Andre,Because the energy is given in W/year, which is absurd for a utility scale system, MWh or MW/year would make much more sense I think. This leads to a very large number indeed which as you can see extends across the page.Best,H. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now